If freedom of speech is absolute, how come it's not applied for private spaces and for the Internet?
14.06.2025 02:23
Insurrection
Insider trading
Conspiracy
You have freedom of speech. If I loan you my computer, I can tell you not to use it for certain things, because it’s mine, you have no right to use it, and if I give you permission to use it I can tell you what you can and can’t do with it.
Freedom of speech does not apply to:
Revenge porn
Can people who have never met you tell if you are a covert narcissist?
False advertising
Child pornography
That’s what it is. You have no right to use other people’s stuff. If people let you use their stuff, they can tell you how you can use it, and they can tell you to stop using it any time they want.
You have freedom to travel. If I loan you my car, I can tell you not to take it out of town, because it’s mine, you have no right to use it, and if I give you permission to use it I can tell you what you can and can’t do with it.
HIPAA violations
Revealing classified information
Terroristic threats
Perjury
And much, much more.
Is it possible for the U.S. government to get rid of the constitution for national safety?
If you’re wondering why free speech doesn’t apply to the internet, it’s because you have no right to use other people’s stuff for free.
No freedom is absolute.
Threats of violence
Red Sox To Acquire Jorge Alcala - MLB Trade Rumors
Trade secrets
Fraud